Settings and activity
255 results found
-
57 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment 
Keith
commented
What might work here is to just allow "partial" payments at any time.
Anyone can use the payment link to pay whatever portion they're responsible for.?
Keith
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Keith
commented
It doesn't seem like the implemented solution solved all of Matt's problem.
should I open a new ticket?
There are different actions needed based on why something is blocked.
if it's blocked for use by an owner or guest of owner, it should trigger a cleaning,
if ti's blocked for maintenance, it might trigger a property inspection.
Simply differentiating by who added the block seems insufficient.
Also, when the agency adds a block I'd like to indicate if it's owner editable.
As it is, if an owner can't get to the the portal to add a block and ask us to do it for them we also then have to edit/delete it when they wan't to change it.
When I add a block I'd like to tag it as an "owner" block so they can manage it.
Keith
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Keith
commented
We, PM"s need to be able to create blocks the owners can edit as well.
As it is now, if we create a block, the owner can't modify it, I'd like to be able to create an "owner block" on their behalf so they can later edit it, but also need the ability to create PM blocks that the owners can't edit (like if we have scheduled maintenance/service and can't have a guest in a unit on a specific date)Also, blocks feed into 3rd parties like vrscheduler, these all trigger events on the other end.
If an owner is staying, we need to clean after them, but if it's blocked for photography or to repair a broken window, then we don't need to clean, so having tags or additional block types would be quite helpful.
-
38 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Keith
commented
full acls would be ideal.
Even at the property level.
you may have some properties where one users is a property manager but for others they're just an associate or booking agent.
Keith
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteKeith
shared this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Keith
commented
I think it would even work to just add a bold "$" before the guests name.
or an icon of a bank or something. if room maybe add the balance due if not 0Keith
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesKeith
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Keith
commented
I think this is related to this one:
https://hostfully.uservoice.com/forums/271343-property-management-platform-web/suggestions/46502164-update-dashboard-userflow-of-processing-new-leadsI would think it would simplify the programming if all the lead management views were the same.
Shouldn't matter if I'm viewing a lead from the dashboard, pipeline or calendar.
All Same info all should work the same.I suppose in some cases where the lead assignee has certain rights that others don't there might be some differences but these should also be consisted based on permissions.
Keith
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesKeith
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesKeith
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
You can choose what is being applied to all properties during you batch Edit - select what to change (having in mind, which properties the particular change(s) will be applied to), and select the property list to apply the change to in the property selector.
An error occurred while saving the comment Keith
commented
I think one solution would be to add checkboxes for the available fields on the bulk screen and we can choose which
Just like we can choose which properties we should be able to choose which fields as well.
An error occurred while saving the comment Keith
commented
I agree. IMHO this "all or nothing" makes this feature effectively useless.
Especially when it includes pricing (cleaning fee, taxes, security deposit) which are likely to be different for each listing.
Keith
supported this idea
·
-
19 votesKeith
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Keith
commented
Currently you can delete the automated review and then just manually send one.
I've not seen a place where this didn't solve my problem.
what I'd like is to have a set of "bad review" templates or even "good review" templates
and choose which one to send.
for automated messages I'd want to select which of my templates get randomly chosen.
also, when the same guest has multiple stays it'd be nice if they didn't get the same review repeatedly.
-
78 votesKeith
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesKeith
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesKeith
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesKeith
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesKeith
shared this idea
·
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Keith
commented
We should be able to search by ANY of the relevant guest information.. Phone number, email, Name, or check-in date range.
Keith
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
This is a great suggestion and we're designing support for it.
Keith
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesKeith
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Keith
commented
The entire inbox is frustrating..
I want to see the listing related to every message I get. and sometimes the same guest has booked 2 different place and I have no idea which message thread a message relates to
For stays longer than 30 days or would be ideal if it worked similar to Airbnb.
They collect 1 month at a time which is typical of a long term stat/lease
People booking 120 day stays often can't afford to pay the whole thing
There does need to be a different payment threshold setup for intermediate length stays vs short term stays